Eric Hatleback's Milwaukee Brewers fan blog

In the National League, the elongated double switch shows again why pitching statistics are quite poorly attributed.  A traditional double switch involves the manager inserting a position player into the game  for the current pitcher and a new pitcher for a position player--typically one who just made an out, so that the new pitcher won't be batting for nearly a full trip through the lineup.

However, this same basic maneuver can also occur by simply pinch-hitting for the pitcher while on offense and then placing the pitcher in for whichever player makes the last out of the inning.  If the team takes the lead (and subsequently does not lose it), the just-substituted-for pitcher gets credited with the win.

The problem is this: if this scenario occurs before the 5th inning, the starting pitcher cannot get the win, so it'll almost certainly be the next guy who pitches that will get the win.  But given that a position player is the opne who was inserted for the pitcher, why wouldn't

Continue reading "More Thoughts on MLB Pitching Statistics"

Here'e another quirky entry into the "Win" category:  http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4318608.  If we used Team pitching statistics, that win would simply go to the Nationals pitching staff, which clearly it should have.

Also, I wonder what the rules are concerning rosters resuming suspended games.  What if the whole team was replaced in the interim?  That team would have a distinct advantage in bench players and pitchers available over the other team.  And what if Hanrahan had been traded to the Astros?  Could he have come into the game in the bottom half, given up the winning run, and earned both the win and the loss?  This one deserves some thought. 

Continue reading "Another Reason Why MLB Needs Team Pitching Statistics"

As the Brewers wrap up a series against the Cardinals and Tony LaRussa's peculiar lineup strategy, I thought it might be worth thinking about what would make certain lineups advantageous.  LaRussa has been hitting the pitcher in the 8th spot, with a position player hitting behind him in the 9th slot, for several years now.  Why?

Well, the aim is to have more men on base for the likes of Pujols as the game progresses.  This seems like a worthy goal, but I think what I'd like to see is a small study done on the benefits of simply getting Pujols (or any elite hitter) more plate appearances rather than trying to put runners on in front of him.  For instance, let's assume that over the course of a season, each slot in the lineup has 20 more plate appearances than the slot below it.  (That is, slot 1 has 20 more PA than slot 2, and slot 2 has 20 more PA than slot 3, etc.)   Then one way to gain more offense is simply to hit Pujols leadoff: he'll have 40 more PA than he does from the 3-hole.  He currently has about 360 PA and 31 HR, so he homers about every 12 PA.  If we round down, we're talking about adding 3 HR to his season simply by giving him more plate appearances.

Continue reading "The Merits of the Pitcher Hitting 8th"

I got into a discussion with Sean yesterday about the post I made a couple of weeks ago concerning when a runner has officially taken possession of a base.  We consulted the rule book (online at baseball-almanac.com, a great site) and found no specific details about the situation.  (Though, admittedly, I did not carefully pore over every bit of it research-style, since we were simply having an entertaining discussion.)  While shifting through various alternative scenarios to try to tease out the answer, this fun one came up:

What happens when a pitch never reaches home plate?  What if it stops halfway there?  Presumably, we decided, it must be called a ball, but how far does it have to travel?  If a pitcher drops the ball while set, that's a balk.  So where is the demarcation between balk and ball?

Continue reading "More Baseball Rules Discussion"

This game typifies why the open base need not always be filled.  Particularly with the winning run on third base, you are asking quite a lot of your pitcher to confine him to the box created by bases loaded.  The Brewers should have gone after Soto--a player coming in cold off the bench--with runners on second and third and 2 outs.  Instead, they blatantly pitched around him for 3 pitches, then intentionally put him on with the fourth pitch to set the stage for the walk-off walk.

By pitching Soto tough, you may still walk him--but you also may get him out.  In fact, Soto makes an out approximately 75% of the time this season, so it seems to me that the odds were in favor of the Brewers if they simply pitched to him.  And the kicker is that this is true of

Continue reading "Brewers - Cubs and Walk-off Walks"

Why are pitching statistics so quirky?  For instance, why does a starter need to go 5 innings to earn a win?  And why should a starter get a loss if his team eventually scores more runs than he gave up? There should be instituted a "Team" category of statistics for pitching.  These would be reserved for special situations, but they appear to be justified.  A "Team Loss" would be assigned when the starting pitcher gives up fewer runs than his team eventually scores.  For instance, say Gallardo gives up 2 runs over 6 innings, but leaves trailing 2-0.  Then, the opposition puts up a 4-spot against the relievers in the 7th, and the Brewers eventually lose 6-5.  Currently, Gallardo gets the loss, but this hardly seems to be an accurate

Continue reading "Team Pitching Statistics in MLB"

When you play fantasy football, you play (almost exclusively) in a head-to-head, points-based system.  When you play fantasy baseball, you play (almost exclusively) in either a rotisserie or head-to-head, categories-based system.  When you play fantasy hockey, you play (almost exclusively) in some form of salary cap, everyone-can-have-player-X-on-the-team sysatem.

Why don't we see rotisserie or category-based football leagues, for instance?  I have a hunch that it's because in fantasy sports, we are all looking for a balance between competing with our friends while still staying as close to the actual game as possible.  Thus, since football uses points, and touchdowns are worth 6, field goals worth 3, etc., we like to carry that over into our fantasy sports.

Continue reading "Why is there "standardization" fantasy sports?"

I thought it would be fitting for my first post to discuss a rules question I've thought about for baseball for quite a long time. Here's the situation: Runner on first, less than 2 outs.  The pitcher accidentally goes into the windup, and the runner takes off for second.  (Or the runner takes off, then the pitcher goes into the windup.)  There is a strange combination of blazing speed in the runner and very slow motion in the pitcher's windup.  The runner reaches second base before the pitch reaches the plate.  The batter hits a lazy fly to the outfield.

Now: does the runner need to tag up at first base or at second base?  The real issue here involves when the runner gains possession of a base and when a "play" in baseball starts.  It could be that as soon as the pitcher begins his motion, the situation is "frozen" and anything that happens after that requires the runner to tag up at first.  Or, it could be that there are no "plays" in baseball, that the action is continuous and that the runner can claim any base he can reach before the ball is struck by the hitter. The second option raises interesting implications for the situation when there is a runner on third with 2 outs.  If he steals home and crosses the plate before the hitter strikes out, does the run count?  That situation is bound to have occurred during some game somewhere, and it should give clues about what the verdict should be in the case with the runner on first with less than 2 outs.

Continue reading "Rules of the game (MLB)"

This is just the trial run for the new blog.

Continue reading "Test Blog"